Aico vs Blackline
Aico vs Blackline financial close comparison. Choose wisely and experience the fastest and most efficient financial close process.
Aico vs Blackline financial close comparison. Choose wisely and experience the fastest and most efficient financial close process.
Compare Aico and Blackline based on real user experiences and other public information. Feel confident about your decision, knowing you have all the facts to choose what's best for you.
This comparison is based on open-source data.
Data is taken from g2.com
Average G2.com score 4.8
"Meets requirements" score - 9.3
"Ease of use" score - 9.6
"Ease of setup" score - 9.0
"Ease of admin" score - 8.7
"Quality of support" score - 9.4
"Product Direction" score - 9.3
Average G2 score 4.5
"Meets requirements" score - 8.8
"Ease of use" score - 8.8
"Ease of setup" score - 7.7
"Ease of admin" score - 8.1
"Quality of support" score - 8.8
"Product Direction" score - 9.4
Looking for the most efficient financial close solution? Discover why Aico's software is the most convenient Blackline alternative on the market.
Aico offers deeper automation for manual journal entries and approvals, while BlackLine specialises in broader financial close tasks
Aico provides a modern, intuitive UI built with SAP in mind; BlackLine has a robust interface but can feel complex to new users.
Aico integrates with SAP, Microsoft Dynamics and Oracle ERPs; BlackLine supports many, but requires more configuration.
Aico offers tailored setups with strong EU-based support; BlackLine delivers scalability with global support and templates.
Aico is market-focused, intuitive, and easily integrates with many systems to enhance the whole financial close process, while ensuring data correctness and policy compliance.
Native integration with Microsoft 365, SAP HANA, and SAP Store, enabling real-time data sync within familiar environments.
Strong presence and support in Nordics, Benelux, DACH, and broader EU, ideal for regional compliance and service localisation.
Designed for finance teams using SAP, with intuitive workflows and familiar Microsoft interfaces to reduce training time.
Relies on both known integrations and third-party tools, which requires additional configuration steps until completely usable.
Extensive global reach, but less tailored for specific European regulatory and operational needs compared to Aico's services.
More generalised interface across industries, which results in being more complex for SAP-heavy enterprises.